1991: The disappointment was thick in Grandpa's silence

Real life vs Alternate Reality
(Click to enlarge)

Back in 1988, when I was recording my grandfather's war stories, he said this:

     "Well so, coming back — I am talking in disorderly way because I didn’t prepare all this, so it will be a hell-of-a-time for you to put this in order."

    Yeah, no kidding, Grandpa Arthur.

    Because it's hard to capture tone of voice in writing, I'll just tell folks how I sound right now: rueful and a little worn-out. I'm not being rude (well, maybe I am, but only a little). I loved and respected my grandfather, but there is no denying that he sometimes had unreasonable expectations.

    Anyway, "hell-of-a-time" is right. I am nearly 4 years into this project, and it's still not done. Occasionally, I wonder if it will ever be done, and sometimes I get just so sick of it, but then I discover some new clue, and my interest flares back to life, burning as brightly as ever.

    I recorded Grandpa the summer after my freshman year in college, and on tape I asked maybe two or three questions while I was recording him, and God, I was so young and just so ... ignorant. Now I have a million questions and I could kick myself because those questions never even occurred to me at the time, and now they will remain forever unanswered because he died nearly three decades ago.

    Well, at least I was curious and motivated enough to ask for his stories in the first place, and I'm grateful for that experience, but the tapes would have been orders of magnitude better if I'd brought along an experienced oral historian.  But, back then, I didn't know such people existed, and who knows if Grandpa would have agreed to talk to one.

    I was always interested in the war, because I knew my grandparents had escaped the Nazis and survived, but beyond thumbing through the pictures in my dad's Time-Life WW2 books, and reading a couple of novels, (including one for kids*), I had no real understanding of WW2. Dad gave me a copy of Shirer's The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich when I was 13 or 14, but I never got past the first 20 pages.

    The tapes sat around until I was a senior, and my first inkling that I had a treasure in my possession occurred when I mentioned them to the professor teaching my Holocaust class (Dr. Penny Gold, now Professor Emeritus at Knox College) and I wondered if maybe I could use them in some manner for my final research project.

    Dr. Gold's eyes widened, and then she got really excited, revealing her inner Indiana Jones. She was a far better teacher and historian than that fictional archeologist, though - she wasn't just excited that this artifact had been unearthed, she was excited on my behalf.

    This was around the time the movement to gather oral histories from those who experienced WW2 personally, from the soldiers, the holocaust survivors, from those who were there first started to gain momentum. Three years later, Steven Spielberg founded the Shoah Visual History Foundation. Its charter was to videotape 50,000 Holocaust survivors and witnesses.

    Dr. Gold suggested that I transcribe the tapes, and because she was far more aware of just how much work transcribing audio sources can be than I was, she offered to let me reduce the required length of my term paper from ... 15 or 20? pages down to 10.

    The paper itself ended up barely 10 pages, but with the transcription, the project ended up somewhere north of 40 pages. And yes, I got an A.

    Like my professor, my family was excited by my project. I sent it to my mom, and it ended up being a little earth-shaking for her, because Grandpa had told me many things he had never told his own kids. The war had been an extremely painful and dangerous time for my grandparents, and they mostly didn't talk about it. I asked her to send a copy to Grandpa, and she did that, but also sent one to my aunt, and just about anyone else who showed even the slightest interest. It was really clear that Mom was impressed, excited, and even proud of my work, and that felt pretty great.

    

    Unlike everyone else in the family, my grandfather was not excited.   

    I'd expected him to be pleased that I had transcribed the tapes of his stories, that I had even used them in scholarly research, and he was glad of it, I think. But mostly, he was ... disappointed.  

    He didn't like that his grammar wasn't perfect, that it—as is typical of oral sources— was full of sentence fragments, and was a little choppy. He didn't like that I hadn't rearranged his stories into chronological order or placed them in a historical context.   Grandpa even called me and asked that I please do two things: to clean up his grammar, and to put the stories in order. He even used a little guilt: I don't remember his exact words, but it was something like, "It would mean so much to me, if you did this one thing for me before I die."

    I said no, and the disappointment was thick in Grandpa's silence. I didn't feel guilty (not yet, anyway), and in a rare instance of self-confidence, I didn't let it bother me (much). He had no clue how much work I'd already put into it. The transcript alone took me 20 or 30 hours to complete (I'm sure I annoyed the other students in the computer lab, with my constant play-stop-rewind-play on my Walkman).   I also simply didn't have time.  I still had the final trimester of my final year of college to go, then I needed to find a job (a daunting task for someone with an English degree).  And, frankly, I was out of steam.

    I also disagreed with him. When transcribing oral history, you present what the subject really said, not what they wished they had said.  

    I figured I'd pick it back up again someday, but then Grandpa died in 1996, and I blinked and 25 years had gone by and I wanted to take part in NaNoWriMo (my daughter had completed two novels before she graduated from HS, and I wanted to keep up with her), and Grandpa's stories seemed like a natural fit.

    And now, all these years after Grandpa's phone call, I feel guilty that I didn't even try to fulfill what was kinda-sorta a dying wish.  Because I totally could have edited it the way he wanted, but in a separate document from the transcript (I haven't budged in my belief that a transcript should be the exact text of an audio source).  But the other part?  Putting it in order, and placing it in a historical context?  

    Oof.

    If I've learned anything in the almost 4 years since I picked up this project again, it's that there was no possible way I could have fulfilled his second request before he died, because I lacked both the necessary experience and, more importantly, the tools to do it quickly.  

    But by 2021, the state of the technology had caught up with my needs, I had decades more experience and knowledge, and I was able to complete that part of the project in less than three years.  I'm guessing that if I had started it in 1991 after that phone call with Grandpa, it would have taken at least 10 years to accomplish what I later did in three.

    I used the internet to research, to accurately identify the correct books to read, movies and TV shows to watch, even newspaper archives. A friend with university access even found information on medical knowledge from the 1940s.   Instead of stumbling upon the occasional useful historical photo, I found thousands of photos with just seconds of work.  The internet also allowed me to find and build friendships with historians all over the world. 

    Computers have progressed, too.  I can do keyword searches through entire books in seconds.   I can listen to books while I'm out walking, and bookmark important passages in audiobooks without even having to stop exercising. Hell, I can even dictate notes in my audiobooks now.  You couldn't do that back when we were using Books on Tape instead of Audible.

    Now, imagine doing all that with the shots-in-the-dark that are card catalogs and inter-library loan, and having to manually skim entire paper books (probably missing key information) for hints and clues, without the ability to do keyword searches using a computer? Or translating the French and Polish letters in Grandpa's immigration folder, with nothing more than a dictionary?  

    I'm beginning to think that my 10-year estimate was wildly optimistic, and I'd have been lucky to finish it in less than 15.  

    * Snow Treasure by Marie McSwigan, about a gold heist in Norway, pulled off by children on sleds, trying to protect the Norwegian treasury from the Nazis. It's a wonderful book.

1940s: Deciphering 80-year-old "immaculate and illegible" handwriting ...in French

     A couple of years ago, a historian friend in France went to the Drôme Department Archives, and photographed about 50 pages of correspondence that were by, about, to, or involving my grandfather. More than half of the pages were handwritten, so I went all ostrich-like for a couple of years, because reading 80-year-old cursive handwriting is hard work, but reading it in a foreign language is 10 times more difficult.

    Procrastinating had a silver lining, though - transcription tools have improved massively in the last two years, and I took advantage of AI to create the initial transcriptions. Then I did a stare and compare to ensure the transcript was correct (despite the improvements, AI does make mistakes, even with the best handwriting).  That worked well for four of the five correspondents (click to enlarge the samples):

The school teacher:

    No matter what country someone is from, a prerequisite for being a school teacher, is having excellent handwriting, and this guy's was among the best I've ever seen.  Seriously, his handwriting could be turned into a font - I'd call it Headmaster Cursive.

The police officer:

    His handwriting is actually pretty neat and easier to read (most of the time) than my grandfather's.  He also leaves a lot of white space between lines, which improves the accuracy of the AI transcription.  But, there is an unfortunate side effect of such neat writing - it exposes the fact that the guy made an unfortunate number of errors in capitalization, punctuation, and grammar. The pattern of errors the spell-checker flagged was completely different from everyone else - it wanted to correct practically every verb tense, for example, and he didn't bother with diacritical marks much.  This isn't to say he was a poor writer, exactly - his writing was clear and easy to understand, and it translated nicely.   

The farmer:

    This guy's writing was also reasonably neat, but very slanty with lots of flourishes. He was the oldest of the authors here; he was born in 1891; it may have been a generational style difference.  His writing also didn't seem to have many errors.

The engineer (my grandfather):

    Grandpa's handwriting is pretty average, neither particularly good nor bad. I'm used to it, so it's one of the easiest for me to read, even though it's actually the second messiest of the batch.  

The doctor (and commander)

The handwriting in black within the square stamp, and
the word, "Suisse" is actually my grandfather's. 

   At a glance, his penmanship doesn't seem so bad, but it is an unusually neat sample of his writing. It says (with clear words in blue, unclear words in brackets): 

"[lury/hevy] cher Lubinski,
Quel est actuellement l’organisme
chargé [ou/du] placement [on/des] enfants [eu/de]
[France/Frcine]?

    You may or may not be able to tell at a glance, but the doctor's handwriting is by far the worst.  Seriously, we all know the jokes about doctors' handwriting, but I wouldn't have expected it to be true across centuries (ok, only 80 years) and cultures.  Speaking of doctor jokes, here's one:

Hmmmm... leaning toward the 2nd one down,
but the 4th one is also a candidate.

 

    Here's a more typical sample of his writing:

    I got:

[recevori] [pecconuel/personnel] [le] [depau/dépôt/pefau] des [fancors/Français].

[fauell/Veuillez] [poscuilor/présenter] un [horuenp/bonjour] à  

Madame Lubinska et [?/aux]  

à [leor/tous] amical [forevelles/souvenir]

[signature]

    So yeah, immaculate and illegible is about right. 

My blood is not for the likes of Ixodes scapularis

I hates ticks. I hates them, I do.

I keep picking places to live that are the Grand Central Stations of Ticks. Hell, I even grew up in Missouri, which is no slouch when it comes to ticks (though it doesn't compete with New Jersey, and especially not with northern Minnesota).

One tick-borne illness 20 years ago is more than enough (Lyme Disease, but we caught it early, so no long-term effects), and I have a friend with another, though I don't know what it's called.  

Frankly, if I could push a button and incinerate all the ticks, I'd be sorely tempted.

Two days ago, I spent about 30 minutes pulling weeds. At bedtime, I remembered that I needed a tick check, and we found three of them attached to me - the tiny ones you can barely see.   We removed them (Lyme risk is low - they have to be on you for more than 24 hours before you are at risk for the disease, and these three had been on me for as much as 12 hours, but probably less) and went to bed.

But not to sleep. 

I got maybe 4 hours of sleep that night, because every little itch and tickle sent a jolt of adrenaline down my spine, and I'd feel around for the little blood sucker that I knew wasn't really there, but my imagination kept gleefully whispering in my ear, "What if?" 

By last night, I was so tired that I went to bed early and slept long and heavily, and now it's hard to shake the grogginess.

But I'm having my coffee, and I'm sitting here shielded from nearly head to toe in coveralls. Soon, I will put on my boots, hat, and mosquito netting, leaving only my hands exposed, because my blood will not be consumed by the likes of ticks.

In the spring of 2024,
protected from mosquitos and ticks.

1945: Arthur's Bicycles

French bicycle troops making their way to the front, 1939 
Source: The Atlantic

    I've been working through about 50 pages of correspondence that are to, by, or about my grandfather.  The letters had been in his commanding officer's files, but are now located in the Drôme Department archives in France. These letters are a lot of fun to read; it's like a peek into their lives in the immediate aftermath of WW2.  

    Anyway, I discovered a bicycle in one of the letters:  

P.S.: When will you come and get the bicycle that ROUX abandoned? If we delay, someone might steal it one day.

--Arthur Lubinski to Louis Robin, 9 February 1945

    Louis Robin was a local butcher who served in the same maquis unit as my grandfather, and after demobilizing, Mr. Robin helped to coordinate some of the efforts of the maquis food cooperatives. It makes sense - as a butcher, he had easier access to food and distribution channels.  He also served in the same section of the same Maquis company as my grandfather, an "SHR" group that supported all the different platoons and groups within the unit.  Léon Roux was a school teacher who seemed to know everyone in the area and had been an officer in the same Maquis unit, someone else my grandfather would have known well.

    Grandpa Arthur must have reached out to Mr. Roux about the bike, because I found another mention in letter dated a few weeks later:

     As agreed, I sent the bicycle to Mr. DRAGON last Monday.

--Léon Roux to Arthur Lubinski, 21 March 1945

    I certainly don't know for sure that it's the same bicycle, but from context, it seems like might be: Léon Roux left a bike behind, and Grandpa started writing people to find out where it needed to be, and finally managed to get the issue resolved.

    It's been 80 years since these letters were written, and I doubt the bike still exists, but I can hope, right? If you are interested, here is a series of wonderful photos of the bicycles used during WW2. Did you know both sides had bicycle machine-gun troops? And that they had bicycle ambulances, and tandem bikes that accommodated up to five people?

    Bicycles played an important part throughout my grandfather's story - he didn't own a car until sometime after he moved to the US in 1947 though he learned to drive while he was still in Europe (the government of France provided him with a car to use while he worked on the reconstruction). But after the invasion of Belgium in 1940, enough infrastructure had been damaged in the attack that public transportation wasn't an option for a while, so he rode his bike 40 km to work (about 2 hours each direction).  

    I don't know for sure what happened to that bike - but I thought perhaps he might have given it to his brother Paul when my grandparents escaped to France.  About a year later, Paul got himself from Belgium to Scotland via Switzerland, France, Spain and Gibraltar, but I mostly don't know how he did it.  Since he too was escaping, I thought maybe he pedaled the backroads at night on his brother's bike, and so I was thrilled when I came across this photo at the article linked above:

Soldiers walk their bikes along a partly frozen lake
on an alpine pass in Switzerland in 1943.
Source: The Atlantic

    It proves that my guesswork regarding how Uncle Paul got himself across Europe wasn't completely implausible. It took him about 18 months to work his way from Belgium to the UK, but about half of it was spent in the Miranda de Ebro concentration camp in Spain.  Even excluding his incarceration, it took a long time, so I think he couldn't have just taken a train, because then the trip would have been measured in days, not months.  So, I think he must have made the journey on foot, on his bike, with the help of underground networks, or some combination of all three (which is how I depicted it in Paul's book).

    After Grandpa escaped to and settled in rural France, he got a job as a farmhand to ensure his family stayed fed. I wrote — and this next bit is completely made up — that he borrowed a bicycle from his landlord so that he could get around the neighborhood more easily.  After they immigrated to the US, Grandpa was forced to buy a car, but I think he must have been nostalgic for his time pedaling around Belgium, because at some point he acquired another bicycle. I recall seeing it in his garage in Tulsa, although I never actually saw him ride it.  

    Interestingly, my grandmother never learned how to ride, and one of my aunts either didn't learn, or had difficulty learning. I too had trouble mastering the bicycle, which makes me wonder if there was a genetic component - but I had a gross motor development delay that meant I was poor at alternating movements (pedaling a bike, or the crawl stroke in swimming) but good at mirror-image movements (breast stroke or jumping jacks). I outgrew it by eight or nine, when I finally learned to ride a bike. 

Spring 1945: Arthur and Léon investigate the .... "Lentil Affair"

The opening of Léon Roux's 19 March 1945 letter
to Commander Planas

    It seems that bureaucracy is universal.  

    I first came across the Lentil Affair (and oddly dramatic-sounding name for something that must have been incredibly irritating for the participants) when I was going through some correspondence in the Drôme Department archives that was to, from, or about my grandfather.

    After the liberation of the region of France where my grandparents lived, there were still wartime shortages of firewood, food, paper, and many other things.  And then with the dissolution of Maquis units all over France, came the problem of what to do with the men and women who had fought to free France from the Nazis. Some maquisards joined the French army, but many (my grandfather was one) demobilized. Grandpa was lucky enough to have a job waiting for him (he was tasked with organizing the rebuilding of the Valence area), but others did not.  And with no jobs, people got even less to eat.

    Captain Planas was put in charge of the Valence-area FFI Amicable Association, which I believe must have been similar to our Veterans Association. In other words, he helped ensure his former soldiers and their families had access to inexpensive food and firewood. I think it must have been like going to work for the VA.

    And that is how, in late 1944, the Lentil Affair got started, commencing a six-month-long ordeal that punished just about everyone involved:

LENTIL AFFAIR REPORT

     When the 4th Company of the 2nd Battalion of the Drôme was dissolved on September 20, 1944, it was agreed to establish among all - mobilized and demobilized - a veterans cooperative aimed at helping comrades in need, and facilitating better access to provisions for everyone.

     Lieutenant ROUX of Petits Robins, now demobilized, began searching throughout the Diois region for farmers willing to sell lentils, potatoes, apples, and other vegetables at fair prices for everyone.

     These negotiations were carried out openly, and a truck that we chartered, went to collect a load of lentils and apples, but in the meantime, the police took notice, and when the truck was on its way back, it was stopped by the police, and the goods were nearly confiscated.  Thanks to the personal intervention of Lt. ROUX, who was escorting the vehicle, the truck reached its destination safely.  

     Later, the farmers who had delivered the lentils were pursued by the Economic Control Office, a formal report was issued, and they were fined.  Once informed, Lt. ROUX phoned to notify us of the situation, and the Commander intervened with the police captain to have the legal actions stopped.

     He replied that the orders had come directly from the Ministry of the Interior, and that they were strict, but that it might still be possible to stop the matter by intervening with the Economic Control and General Supply Office, which we did, and I personally appealed to Superintendent FOLLET, and Former Intendant RAYMOND of the Maquis promised to intervene.

     However, around December 15, we were informed that the farmers were required to pay a fine before December 28. I again intervened with Superintendent FOLLET and Mr. DONNADIEU requesting that the prosecutions be suspended.  

     I thought the matter was settled, but about a week ago, we learned that the fine for each farmer had not been canceled, but had been reduced to 1,100 francs per farmer.

--Mr. Mammouth, date unknown, but probably early spring 1945.

    (Using all caps for last names is a convention used in French writing).

    From that, it looks like Léon Roux started buying food from local farmers in the fall of 1944. The following spring, he said this to Commander Planas:

Indeed, Lubinsky informed me that our 'lentil affair' was over. But I fear there has been another mistake, for the theater of operations was not Valdrôme; rather, it was Beaurières, or more exactly La Bâtie-Crémezin, a few kilometers away. But I will settle this question with Lubinsky.

-- Léon Roux, 19 March 1945

    Note: The misspelling of my grandfather's name (Lubinsky when it should have been Lubinski was a common mistake. For what it's worth, my family is Polish, and the suffix is spelled "-ski" in Poland.  They spell it "-sky" in Russia.

    Two days later, Mr. Roux sent a rather grouchy letter to my grandfather:

     Having been entrusted by Commander PLANAS with the unfortunate matter of the lentils purchased by the 4th Company’s Cooperative, I requested a report from MAMMOUTH, who previously dealt with the case. Please find the attached copy of this report.

     With this document, I visited Mr. FOLLET and Mr. DONNADIEU and there I was informed that the matter is settled and that the Mayor of VALDROME confirmed this in writing. Yet last Sunday you informed me that the lentils were not purchased in VALDROME but elsewhere, and that the fines were never reimbursed to the farmers.

    As for me, I deeply regret having become involved in this matter without having been properly briefed. Although this is unpleasant for me, I will resume inquiries as soon as you provide a clear and detailed account of the facts.

-- Léon Roux, 21 March 1945

    And finally two weeks later, Mr. Roux mentioned it a final time in another letter to my grandfather:

     Yes, Mr. Brun’s case was the only 'lentil affair'. He is the only one who received ... and paid!

-- Léon Roux, 4 April 1945

    Now, I have no idea who Mr. Brun is. Was he one of the farmers? Or was he an FFI member from one of the units based near Valence?  I'm guessing he was a farmer who sold lentils to the FFI cooperative, and that he received a citation and paid it. I can only hope that he was reimbursed for the fine, and that the Lentil Affair was genuinely over.

1944: Who then are you, Monsieur René Payot?

 "Who then are you, Monsieur René Payot, that in homes all over France, people gather every week to hear your voice, just as they likely do across all the oppressed countries of Europe?"

--Arthur Lubinski, October 1944 

René Payot
Source: Le Dauphine Libéré

     I've shared my grandfather's tribute to René Payot, but like (I suspect) most Americans, I'd never heard of him before coming across my grandfather's article. From what I've learned about him since, I think he must hold a place in Europe that is similar to that of Walter Cronkite on this side of the Atlantic, and Grandpa's tribute to Payot makes me want to read the transcripts of Payot's 12 or so broadcasts from the summer of 1944, though I haven't been able to find them.

    From what I can tell, Payot gave hope to millions of people who were living under Nazi occupation. It's hard for me to even imagine what that must have been like, gaining hope (rather than despair) from a journalist, because like most Americans, I have never lived under foreign occupation. And while I'm old enough to remember Mr. Cronkite, I am now living through a time of unprecedented distrust of the media. 

    There's not a whole lot about Payot on the internet.  There is no article about him on the English-language Wikipedia, and the one on the French Wiki* site is pretty rudimentary.

* If like me, you don't speak French, download translation extensions for your browser, and then the page will automatically display in whatever language you want.

    I did find out that in 1997, Michel Caillat published a book called René Payot, An Ambiguous Look at War, but it's in French and out-of-print.  I learned that his broadcasts were well-known for his objectivity and lack of spin, that he was trusted by the French, Belgians, and Swiss for being trustworthy, but I knew that already from my grandfather's writing.

    Payot was anti-communist and anti-Nazi, and while he initially supported the Vichy government in France, by 1942, he had become a staunch anti-fascist, and a supporter of Charles de Gaulle.  I did find that there is a scholarship in his name that is still being awarded today; it is supported by the radio stations of the French-speaking public media in Switzerland, France, Belgium, and Canada, among others.

    Other than that, my internet searches turned up little else, so I resorted to using AI to search for me (I know, I know), but it did gather a bit more than I had found before:

• His radio show was broadcast via the powerful transmitter in Sottens, Switzerland. Because it released unbiased information (the Swiss were officially neutral, though Payot was not), and because the Swiss army recognized how important unbiased reporting was, they protected it throughout the war.  
• He used the pseudonym "Puck," and was "known for his sharp political critiques," and sometimes satire.
• He was committed to Swiss federalism and democracy.
• He was inducted into the French Legion of Honour.
• There's a square named for him near the University of Geneva.
• His wartime broadcasts focused on communism, Nazism, and totalitarianism.
• He was good at analyzing complicated international events and reporting on them with a great deal of nuance to his listeners in a way that gained trust, by reporting the good and the bad (something the BBC also did during the war, and also gained trust because of it).
• His radio show continued until 1969.

      Perhaps Mr. Payot isn't well-known in America today, but when he died in Geneva in May of 1970, the New York Times published an obituary for him in the May 16, 1970 issue.

October 1944: Arthur writes a tribute (and proves he is a damn fine writer)

     It's funny what you find when digging through a loved one's papers after they die. There are the usual expected items, like paperwork and old bills, and often a surprise or two, but sometimes, one is lucky enough to unearth a beautiful story, a gift to those who are left behind.   This is about one such gift.

    But this story is quite different from Grandpa's other writing from that time.  He wrote it in his native French for one thing, and for another, I think he was trying to be eloquent. He always was a good writer, but this is something extraordinary.  It must have been important to him, because three years later, he carried this handwritten original across an ocean, and five decades later we found it in his files.

    And unlike his other personal writing, he didn't write it on his beloved yellow legal pads.  Instead, he wrote it on a blank police report of all things.   

Police report used in Valence, France during the
occupation. This is page 3 of a 5-page tribute.

    After France was liberated, government entities stopped using forms that said "d'Etat" on them (as it was associated with the collaborationist Vichy government, which by the end of the war was tremendously unpopular), and so the Valence PD relegated this particular report to be used as scrap paper.  Paper was still in short supply due to wartime shortages, and so scrap paper got used instead of being discarded.  Grandpa's FFI unit also took over the Valence police barracks immediately after the city was liberated at the end of August, 1944, so he would have had easy access to such scrap paper. 

    I've written about the first part of this article before - when I compared Grandpa's three versions of his escape up a mountain, with Dr. Michel Planas's version of the same event, but I now have access to much better transcription and translation tools, and I re-did the translation (as always favoring the literal and use of cognates as much as possible, yet making sure it works in English). Grandpa also used some very complex French sentence constructions that resulted in confusing phrases in the translation that sometimes contradicted what he actually said.  This time, however, I'm including the second part, a tribute to a Swiss war correspondent named René Payot.

    When I finished the new translation, I was left in awe at the beauty of his writing, which reads like it was written by statesman speechwriter with a side gig as a naturalist poet undergoing basic training. He writes of forced marches and storms in the mountains, of the treasured miniature radio he used to listen to Payot, and finally of the freedom of speech and conscience.

    See for yourself (the original French is at the end of this article):

Tribute to René Payot

The marching orders have just been given. The Company is leaving its forward position on the plain to join its comrades holding the plateau some thousand meters above. The endless column snakes along the mountain paths and trails, sometimes visible from afar, and at others plunges into the woods, where it could be said that friendly foliage physically hides it from the gaze of foreign birds of prey.  

Little by little, the pace of our ascent slows. A mounting fatigue takes hold of each man, his shoulders bend under the burdens of his mountain pack, his weapons, and as much ammunition as it was humanly possible to carry. The march has gone on for several hours, yet the company is still not halfway there. Time slips by.  Each step aches, and every moment, the pain in our muscles intensifies. Just two hundred more meters, and it seems we’ll no longer be able to go on. But at the end of that distance, willpower overcomes exhaustion, and we keep moving forward... We are still 10 kilometers from our objective, and drops of sweat flood our faces, stream into our eyes, and blind us, yet we keep moving forward.... 

A storm crashes into the mountain. Lightning streaks through the sky. Thunder crashes, almost wanting to shatter the stony path. Torrential rain drenches the forest.  It could be said that the earth and heavens merge into a single chaos. Not a thread on us remains dry. Our shoes, heavy with the water they have drunk, wade through the sunken trail, now a sudden rushing stream.  But we keep going, we always keep going... 

Night has fallen by the time the company finally arrives at its destination. They are to take over two farms and a shepherd’s hut. In near-total darkness—there is no electricity on the plateau — the various groups settle into sheds and haylofts. Guards are posted and kitchens are set up. 

Despite his extreme fatigue and the cold, the "radio man" leaves the farm in search of the mule convoy, which must have gotten lost in the mountains. Into the opaque night, the darkest night, he hurries off to find the column to which he entrusted his field radio - the little parachuted gem knows as "Biscuit."  

    An hour later, he's finally tuned in. Headphones on, pencil in hand, he jots down a few notes by the flickering glow of a candle. A few minutes later, he announces the latest news: “No message for us - Russian troops advanced 40 kilometers in 24 hours in the Bialystok sector. - A thousand American bombers attacked German fuel depots. - Enemy counterattacks repelled by the British southwest of Caen, etc..." 

In each person’s mind, the same thought arises: “All this and nothing to report — just blood on the distant Polish plain…”  To the west, the long-awaited day has yet to come. 

However, the radio man continues: "Yes, but it's Saturday night - in 30 minutes, at 11:15 we can catch René Payot on shortwave." 

“That’s true,” someone replies. “We missed it yesterday - we must catch it tonight.” 

And despite their exhaustion, a small circle of officers remains beside the radio man to hear what René Payot has to say. 

Who then are you, Monsieur René Payot, that in homes all over France, people gather every week to hear your voice, just as they likely do across all the oppressed countries of Europe where those with the most influence know French?  What explains this extraordinary influence you hold over millions of listeners? 

Above all, we all felt that at heart, you were an ally. Your country’s neutrality did not allow you to express this openly. But we understood, courtesy of your finely ironic and nuanced phrases, the jabs only a Gaullist would catch on the fly but the heavy German mind would miss, and most of all, your transitions, for which no description could ever suffice. 

But this is not the principal reason for your influence. Your sympathy for the Allied cause alone cannot explain your prodigious success, because that sympathy was already shared with us by every voice of the free world. We saw in you, Monsieur René Payot, a man who, in dissecting and analyzing the lives of nations, sought to set aside his own passions and partisan sympathies, a man who strives to judge with logic and intelligence alone. 

Sometimes you arrive at conclusions that dishearten us, and no doubt yourself as well. Yet we still welcomed them, because it made us feel closer to reality.  On the other hand, when you gave us information or deductions that matched our deepest hopes, they brought us even greater satisfaction, because we knew they came from a search for truth, and not from propaganda-- whether for a just cause or a harmful one.

It must not happen in the world of tomorrow, a world that will no doubt be striving toward improving the human condition and achieving a more just distribution of wealth -- it must not happen, I say -- that in such a world, great open minds don't have a place. It is essential that in society there always be men who speak and write freely, obeying only an inner need to seek what seems to be genuine truth, even if their ideas may contradict official propaganda, party rule, or corporate trust. 

I hope that in countries that remained free, and those becoming so again, we will always find both the critical and independent minds like yours, but also the conditions that allow them to flourish and speak. 

In the long dark night of the Nazi occupation, those conditions no longer existed, and yet through the ether, from beyond the Gestapo’s control, came the flickering light of the purest torch of Truth and Liberty.

Arthur Lubinski

Valence, October 1944

   

 Damn. That's good.

    There are a few "it could be saids" and similar phrases still in place, which are a little awkward in English (but are probably smoother in the original French), but I left them in to ensure that I remained true to his actual words. I think he must have written the story for publication, because he calculated the number of words in the article.

Page 6 of Grandpa's article, listing the word counts

     I don't know, maybe it was published somewhere?

    When I read this, I'm amazed at his talent (he was an engineer by trade, and not a writer), but I also feel a little uneasy, because I think just maybe ... that he was a better writer than I am.  

    I've always known my grandfather was a good writer.  He wrote a couple of books and many industry papers. A petroleum engineer once told me the story of taking a casing design class, and the professor handed out a copy of my grandfather's 1962 paper Helical Buckling of Tubing Sealed in Packers, and told the class "when given the choice of what to take with you to a deserted island, Arthur Lubinki's paper, or a beautiful movie star ... always chose the paper. The movie star will age, but the paper will always be beautiful."  

    It's also fitting that there's an industry award named for him, the Arthur Lubinski OTC Best Paper Award, that honors the highest quality paper presented at the OTC conference.  The award is often called "a Lubinski," as in, "he won a Lubinski."

Hommage à René Payot

L’ordre de marche vient d’être donné. La Compagnie quitte la position avancée face à la plaine pour rejoindre les camarades qui tiennent le plateau à quelque mille mètres au-dessus d'elle. L’interminable colonne serpente sur les chemins et sentiers de montagne, tantôt visible de loin, tantôt s'engouffrant dans les bois, dant le feuillage complice la cache, dirait-on matériellement, à la une des oiseaux de proie étrangers.  

Petit à petit le rythme de la progression se ralentit. Un fatigue grandissante s'empare de chaque homme, dont les épaules ploient sous le fardeau du sac de montagne, des armes et l’autant de munitions que il était humainement possible d’emporter. La marche dure déjà depuis plusieurs heures et la compagnie m’est pas encore à mi-chemin. Le temps passe. Chaque pas commence de provoquer une peine musculaire qui s'amplifie rapidement. Encore deux cents mètres, et nous ne pourrons plus, semble-t-il avancer. Mais au bout de cette distance la volonté vaine la fatigue, et l’on avance toujours … Nous sommes encore à 10 km du but, des gouttes de sueur inondent le visage, coulent dans les yeux, aveuglent, mais on avance toujours … 

Un orage s'abat sur la montagne. Le ciel est sillonné d'éclairs. Le tonnerre semble vouloir faire éclater les rochers. Une pluie torrentielle inonde les bois. On dirait que le terre et les cieux se confondent en un seul chaos. H m’y a plus sur nous un fil de sec. Les souliers, alourdis par l’eau qu'ils ont bue, pataugent dans le chemin creux, devenu soudain un torrent. Mais on avance, on avance toujours … 

La nuit est tombée lors qu’enfin la compagnie arrive à destination. Elle occupera deux fermes et une bergerie. Dans la quasi-obscurité, car sur le plateau il m’y a point d'électricité, les divers groupes se cassent dans les remises et les fenières. On organise le service de gardes, les cuisines.

En depit de tomte sa fatigue et du froid, le “radio” quitte la ferme a la recherche de la colonne muletiere qui a du se pendre dans la montagne. Dans la nuit opaque, la nuit incre, il s'élance à la recherche de la colonne a la quelle il a confié son poste de radio de campagne, le petit bijou parachute, dénommé “biscuit”. Un heure après, il est enfin à l'écoute. Le casque aux oreilles, le crayon en main, il prend rapidement quelques notes à la lueur vacillante d’une bougie. Quelques minutes plus tard il annonce les dernières nouvelles: “Pas de message qui nous concerne - Avance rus de 40 km en 24 heures dans le secteur de Bialystok. - Mille bombardiers américains ont attaqué les ressources allemandes en carburants. – Contre-attaques ennemies repoussées par les Britanniques au sud-ouest de Caen, etc…” 

Dans l’esprit de chacun naît ce commentaires “Somme toute R.A.S., sang dans la plaine de Pologne si lointaine … À l'ouest de jour tant attendu n’est pas encore venue”. 

Cependant le "radio" ajoute: “Oui, mais c’est samedi aujourd'hui; dans une demi-heure, á 23 heures 15, nous pourrons capter René Payot sur ondes courtes”. 

“C’est vrai” - lui répond-on- “Nous n'avons pu l’avoir hier, il faut le prendre aujourd’hui”. 

Et malgré la grande fatigue, un petit cercle d'officiers restera auprès du “radio” pour savoir ce que dira RENÉ PAYOT. 

Qui donc êtes-vous, Monsieur René Payot, pour que dans tous les foyers de France on se rassemble une fois par semaine pour vous écouter et qu’il en est probablement de même dans tous les pays opprimés d'Europe en ce qui concerne les élites qui connaissent la langue française? A quoi est dû ce prodigieux ascendant que vous exercez sur des millions d’auditeurs? 

Tout d’abord nous sentions tous que de cœur vous étiez votre allié. La neutralité de votre pays ne vous permettait point de l’exprimer ouvertement. Mais nous nous comprenions, grâce a vos phrases nuances d’une fine ironie, grâce à vos pointes qu'un gaullois saisissait au vol et qui étaient probablement sans justification pour le lourd esprit germain, grâce surtout à vos transitions pour lesquelles toute épithète semblerait vaine. 

Mais la ne gît point la principale raison de votre ascendant. Votre sympathie pour la cause alliée ne saurait expliquer votre prodigieux succès, car une telle sympathie nous était déjà acquise parmi tous les porte-parole des pays libres. Nous sentions en vous, Monsieur Rene Payot, un  homme qui pour disséquer, analyser les faits de la vie des nations, essaye de faire abstraction de ses sympathies, de ses passions, un homme qui pour juger, tâche de n’utiliser que la logique et l’intelligence.  

Parfois vous arrivez à des conclusions qui ne nous rejouissaient pas, - ni vous non plus, j’en suis sûr. Néanmoins nous aimions en prendre connaissance, car nous nous sentions alors plus près de la réalité. Par contre, lorsque les renseignement ou les déductions que vous nous communiquiez correspondaient à nos voeux profonds, ils nous procuraient un contentement d'autant plus vif, que nous les savions issues d'une recherche de la vérité et non d'un désir de propagande que cela soit au service d'une bonne ou d'une mauvaise cause. 

Je ne faudrait pas que dans le monde de demain qui sera sans mil donte oriente vers la recherche d’une amélioration de la condition humaine d’une plus juste répartition des richesses, il ne faudrait pas, dis-je, que dans ce monde, de grands esprits ouverts ne puissent plus trouver place. Je est indispensable que dans la société il y ait toujours des hommes qui puissent s’exprimer et écrire librement en n'obéissant qui à leur besoin inné de chercher ce qui leur semble être honnêtement la vérité, même si leurs ideas, peuvent déplaire à une propagande officielle, au parti qui détient le pouvoir ou à un trust quelaouque. 

J'espère que dans les pays restés libres, comme dans ceux qui redeviennent tels, ou trouvera toujours, à la fois, des esprits critiques et indépendants comme le votre, ainsi que les conditions qui leur permettent de s'épanouir et de s'exprimer. 

Mais dans la nuit obscure de la longue occupation nazie de telles conditions n’existaient plus apportait alors, a travers l'éther, incontrôlable, par la Gestapo, les reflets due plus pur flambeau de Vérité et de Liberté.

Arthur Lubinski

Valence, octobre 1944