 |
| Aeropress Steel |
I admit it. I am a crow.
I like shiny new coffee equipment, and I recently got yet another Aeropress. I have a smoked plastic version that predates Alan Adler's retirement and sale of Aeropress to Tiny Ltd, the overpriced (but beloved) glass version released a couple of years ago, and I now have a just-released Aeropress Steel, along with a steel flow-control cap heavy enough to slay Goliath, should anyone sling it at him. Unless AP releases something extraordinarily different, the Aeropress Steel is my last one. Really.
Differences from other versions:
- It has additional capacity, about 350 ml vs 315 ml for the glass and plastic versions. I really like that.
- It is made with just two materials: steel and silicon.
- The stir stick isn't as heavy-duty as the one that comes with the glass version. Whether this is good or bad is a matter of personal preference.
- It produces about the same cup of coffee as the plastic and glass versions (unsurprising, since it's the same brewer).
- The inside of the chamber has a textured surface, so it makes a slight swishing sound lacking in the other versions. I don't care for this, but it's an extremely minor issue.
- It's fully dishwasher safe like the plastic one, but unlike that glass, which requires handwashing (I still say that was a stupid decision on their part).
- Weight of the brewer (including cap, chamber, plunger, and stir stick) - plastic 215g (with Prismo cap instead of the original), steel 699g, glass 889g. So it's heavy, but not as heavy as the glass.
- Like the plastic version, it should be nearly indestructible, though I suspect that if you drop it off a house, it'll dent instead of bounce.
- Of the three, it's the hardest to press, particularly with a two-serving recipe. It's noticeably more difficult to push the brew water through that volume of grounds, though it's not problematic.
- Like the glass, the chamber is double-walled, so the outside doesn't get hot during brewing. You still have to be careful removing the cap, which does get hot.
- You can't see through it so you have to brew by feel.
Things I like:
- It's not going to break
- It's lighter than the glass, so it's better for travel than the glass (but not the plastic)
- Greater capacity
- It's less expensive than the glass
- Dishwasher safe
Things I don't like:
- This is a minor issue, but the texture of the inside of the chamber is textured, and the swishing sound when it rubs is a little unpleasant. I wonder why they didn't use polished stainless steel inside the chamber?
- I can't see through the brew chamber walls (inherent in a non-transparent material). Not much can be done about that, but they should have done a better job providing other indicators. For example, only level 5 is printed on the inside. 1-4 are missing.
- The plunger seal is compressed when it's pushed all the way through. This is a major design flaw, but easily fixed by removing a gasket.
 |
| Level 5 is the only one printed on the inside |
I either brew by weight or fill the brewer all the way up, so the lack of markings inside isn't really a big deal, but anyone who uses the level markings for the various recipes will find it annoying. I think they should have printed the levels on both the outside and on the inside. And putting some sort of markings on the plunger barrel to show progress while plunging would have been really nice.
By far the most significant design flaw, however, is the plunger length. It's too short by about 2 mm. Many people store the plastic AP with the plunger pushed into the chamber, and the seal protrudes out the bottom just enough that it isn't compressed by the walls of the brew chamber. If you store it compressed, the seal eventually stops expanding properly and starts leaking, requiring a new seal. The plastic AP was cheap enough that people often replaced the whole unit, rather than chasing down a new part. That's less likely with the steel version given its price, but the design guarantees the seal will need replacing sooner (it's the only part that will need replacing over time, and it's fortunately inexpensive).
There is an easy fix, however. Just remove the rubber gasket around the top of the plunger. I think its purpose is to make it easier to remove from the storage stand. Without the gasket, the seal protrudes fully from the brew chamber. There are two minor drawbacks to removing the gasket: it's slightly harder to get a hold of the plunger to remove it from the stand, and there is a little up-and-down play when the plunger is pushed fully through the chamber, which means it can rattle if you give it a good shake.
 |
Left: Seal not extending fully with gasket Right: Seal fully extended after gasket removal |
My initial impression of brewing with it is that it makes coffee that tastes like it came from an Aeropress. It really doesn't make coffee that is all that different from the plastic or glass version. I also think this may be the best value-for-the-money of the two premium versions. It's dishwasher safe, nearly indestructible, has a greater capacity, and is lighter and less expensive than the glass version.
The plastic one is a great brewer, and I used mine for years, even though I don't like brewing in plastic. I love the glass version - being able to see the brewing is really nice, but it's expensive and breakable. You give up the nice view with the steel version, but otherwise, it's all upsides. I bought the steel version to be my travel brewer until the glass one breaks (when, not if!). Then I'll use the steel one for both everyday use and travel.
Steel Flow Control Cap:
 |
Left: Standard cap Right: Flow-control cap |
Years before the steel and glass versions came out, I discovered that I liked how recipes brewed inverted tasted, but I didn't actually like brewing that way - using the brewer upside-down is wobbly and prone to being knocked over. I happily switched from the regular cap to the Fellow Prismo which has a valve that prevents flow-through during brewing. The coffee comes out only when you plunge. The steel flow-control cap was released at about the same time as the AP Steel, and I'm delighted to have a valved cap that works with the glass and steel versions. Not much to say about it - it works perfectly, is heavy, and sometimes makes an amusing farting noise when pressing. Glad to have it, but it's expensive.
Articles in the series:
Aeropress Comparisons Part 1 - First Impressions: Aeropress Steel (this article)
Aeropress Comparisons Part 3: Temperature Tests and Results (coming soon)